Books The psychoanalytic movement is alive and constantly growing. After Freud , it has continued to develop due to its remarkable spread ever since the. Three years after I’d met him and underwent therapy with him, I had the opportunity to interview Joseph Knobel Freud in Buenos Aires. On the. Joseph Knobel Freud:I have many more relatives who have the surname Freud in Buenos Aires. Those three are the ones who are directly.
|Published (Last):||12 September 2011|
|PDF File Size:||14.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In many of the situations experienced by children, psychoanalysis helps them face the things that happen to them in a different way. I would like to state that I fully support the view that psychoanalysis can cure, solve conflicts and symptoms, and reduce fear and suffering.
Freud’s Grandson to Give Lecture in Athens |
Play is essential in childhood. The subject we are discussing here today is very broad in its scope. I will attempt to offer a few answers about it focusing on the analysis of children and adolescents.
Having hopes for the future, seeing a possible future where others see nothing at all, is jjoseph in these cases. In many of the situations experienced by childrenpsychoanalysis helps them face thing that happen to them in a different way.
What is specific to analysis with children is that the listening process is diversified; the discourse is broader because it is not only associated with oral language, with words. The corollary of this is that where playing is not possible then onobel done by the therapist is directed towards bringing the patient from knohel state of not being able to play into a state of being able to play.
This first motion can lead to establishing a genuine therapeutic relationship.
Joseph Knobel Freud
In Spanish, the verb esperar, to wait, has the same root as esperanza, hope—in other words, the possibility of believing in the future, trusting others, and finding a space for oneself depends on how much we succeed in broadening our ability to wait.
Pediatricians and neurologists sometimes claim that they would achieve the same results with medication: Suggesting to children that they play with animal figures and dolls, and knobep without thinking about it, both contribute to creating the necessary transitional space so that thoughts have a place to joswph thought, memories have a place to be remembered, and affects have a place to be sustained.
This enables the child to bring out his or her fears through play, and the analyst to influence those fears in a different way. The child and the parents bring us a story, a history, and even a prehistory of their lives and situations; they often also bring us the symptom that led them to seek our assistance.
Freud’s Grandson to Give Lecture in Athens
Needless to say, any psychoanalyst who works with children starts off with a series of theoretical concepts about the structuring of those children, in order to be attuned to the failures that may appear in their development and propose one specific approach or another.
Today, we encounter severe pathologies in children and adolescents. My point is that, very often, when we assess the possibility of treating a child by holding a series of diagnostic interviews, we discover that those who need jpseph are not the child, joesph the parents; they may need counseling or it may be appropriate to treat the family as a whole.
Children speak to us through their games, their drawings, their gestures, and even their silences. Psychoanalysis 0 0 0. The opposite of play is not what is serious but what is real.
Books – Joseph Knobel Freud
The first knobsl is to not leave the subject stuck in an unmovable place. From the moment an analyst agrees to take on a case, he or she is clearly aiming for a possible future in which therapy can take place and the traumatic areas that threaten to repeat themselves can be worked through. Any analysis, at any age, is a historification process. In treatment, the ones rushing the process are often the parents.
As analysts, stirring up the past, do we attempt to leave that past in its annihilating function as an acknowledgment of what cannot be changed, or can we run the risk of stirring up that past, which is often empty, in order to shape a possible future?
Most of them involve cases where listening or jospeh to recreate a history reveals a huge void, a veritable collapse: